Skip to main content

Explaining practitioner enquiry to those who cannot see

In the last twelve months I have been asked by various people to justify our focus on practitioner enquiry as the main vehicle on our professional and school development journey. The questions usually go along the lines of: 'What has been the impact of practitioner enquiry for your learners?' 'How does practitioner enquiry help your school improvement plan?' 'Why do let teachers all do different things when they carry out an enquiry?' 'What will I see when I go in a classroom to show practitioner enquiry is happening?' And, the worst of all, 'can you give me six easy steps so I can get others to take part?' At first, these questions didn't bother me, as I understood people were interested, didn't understand what practitioner enquiry was, and I quite liked explaining what we were doing and why. Nowadays, they tend to just pee me off! It could be my age.

The reason they raise my ire is mainly to do with the fact that the people who keep asking me such questions, are visitors to the schools I lead who tend to be the 'bean counters' of the system who don't understand and don't want, or have time, to understand. They are motivated heavily by accountability agendas and it disturbs them that such an approach is not easy to 'see', so that they are able to tick a box to say it is happening. After all, enquiry approaches are now an expectation from all teachers in Scotland's professional standards. It is also still an approach that not many whole schools are following and which has, at various times, put myself and our staff in opposition to those who would seek to direct and control our every move in school.

They also annoy me because behind the sometimes inane questions they ask I can detect the scepticism about the approach and its impact. The trouble is we have a host of data and evidence that demonstrates the impact of what we have been engaged in for almost seven years now, but it is complicated and takes time to interrogate and understand. There is not one piece of A4 paper that would give you the information you are looking for. You would need to take time to understand what practitioner enquiry entails, the values that underpin it, the dispositions that it promotes and how it changes your approach to everything you do. Armed with that understanding you would then need to spend more time engaging with myself and teachers in professional dialogue around the approach and how it has changed our professional agency and identity. You would need to have conversations with learners about the changes they have experienced in learning activities and how it feels to be in our schools as a learner. You would have to look at the hard data and assessments we have that show us how our learners have moved on in their learning and how they understand what they are doing in a deeper way. You would have to understand individual journeys that have been made by each member of staff, as well as our learners, and you would need to understand how pedagogical practices have changed over time, and whole-school approaches that have had to change as a result of our improved knowledge and understanding. You would also need to see how all of this is informed by research and evidence about what might work, but how we have had to adapt this to fit our particular context. 

Then you might begin to understand why you may struggle to 'see' practitioner enquiry in each classroom. You might understand then why when something is embedded into you as a disposition it becomes part of you as a professional teacher, informing your thinking and approach to what you do. It is not a visible  trick' or 'technique' you can tick a box to say you have seen in a classroom, in every lesson and on every day. There are no lollipop sticks to see here. It is a way of being. You might understand why it has to be different for every teacher, as they are all in different places on their own development journey, and each has different strengths and development needs. You might begin to see that it connects everything in our school improvement plan and keeps us focused on our core purposes of education, learning and teaching. You might finally begin to see the complexity of what we do, and how such an approach helps us deal with this in a meaningful and sustainable way. You might understand when I tell you about the times we have had to stop or go backwards before we were able to move forward again. You might see how we are trying to deal with the holistic development of each member of staff and each individual child and why we are not narrowly focused on accountability and performability agendas. You might also see how all of this has helped both the schools I lead to move on from where they were seven years ago, and begin to see how they will be different again in another seven years.

You might, however you just might not have the time!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Six Qualities of Educational Leadership

I wrote a post a few weeks ago (The six tasks of leadership 12/12/15) following an article about Sir Tim Brighouse, who had identified what he thought were the six key tasks for school leaders. My own list was a bit different to Tim's but it also set me thinking about what might be the qualities you would look for in high performing school leaders. I give you my six as a stimulus for discussion and perhaps your own consideration of what qualities we should look for in school leaders. The first is authenticity. I believe all school leaders need to be authentic and to really walk the walk of their talk. There can be nothing so dispiriting for school community members than being led by a leader who says one thing but does another. Remember to say what you mean and mean what you say. I think the highest performing leaders possess emotional awareness. They know themselves well and they know the people they lead well too. They understand the importance of relationships and how to ta

Evaluation: a process, not an event

Throughout my time as a school leader, and since, I have wrestled with the challenge of evaluation, in terms of measuring the impact of change, in a way which is meaningful and useful . Early in my career, such evaluation was very much viewed as an event, or events, that happened towards the end of a project, or piece of work, usually occurring towards the end of a school year. This was often a time filled with lots of scrabbling around looking for 'evidence' that could be put into some sort of report aimed at different different audiences. It felt stressful, concocted at times and often disconnected from the whole change agenda. Evaluation was a thing to be endured at the end of something else, with its main purpose consisting of proving you had been doing something to different people. Some of these would take what you gave them, and put that into their own 'evaluation report' for a cluster of schools, a local authority, or even a national system. A major issue with

Some thoughts for new student teachers

  Having gained a host of new followers on Twitter, who are either completing PGDE, or other student teacher qualifications, got me thinking about the advice, thoughts, comments I would give to those embarking on their own professional learning journey.   It is heart-warming to see, and hear, the enthusiasm of new entrants into the profession. They are passionate about their career path, and are constantly enthusing about the high quality input they are receiving from lecturers, professors of education and practitioners. My first piece of advice would to use those feelings as a touchstone, to go back to and revisit, throughout your career, but especially when you are facing challenges. Teaching is one of the most satisfying and rewarding professions to be involved in, but throughout your career you will encounter a myriad of challenges, and during these times it is often worth your while reminding yourself of why you came into the profession, and re-consider your early enthusiasms.   W