Skip to main content

Just How Important Are Headteachers To Schools?

The range of responses to the question posed in the title of this post will range from 'very' to 'not at all.' But where does the real truth lie?

There is one school of thought that suggests the Headteacher as the most important member of the staffing compliment of any school. This argument hinges on the hierarchical structure that pertain in many schools. In such structures, the Headteacher is at the pinnacle of the hierarchical pyramid. They believe that the Headteacher is most important as they are the ones who will drive forward improvements, set the agenda for the school, set and raise standards, deploy resources and deal with underperformance. The quality of the school is a reflection of the quality of the Headteacher. Their sheer force of will, personality and charisma will be reflected throughout the school and in all areas.

Others argue that the Headteacher is not so important or crucial. This argument  supports the view that it is really teachers who deliver what is important in all schools. If schools are about teaching and learning, then it can only be teachers who will directly impact on this. What goes on in each classroom and each learning experience is dictated by the quality of the teaching compliment, not the Headteacher. Most Headteachers have long since stopped teaching and,for many teachers, they lose their credibility as teachers only a few weeks after leaving the classroom. It can be argued that a school is a bit like an orchestra, full of very skilled teachers, instead of musicians, who will carry on delivering on a daily basis, no matter who is leading or conducting.

I see aspects of both these arguments I agree with. I don't support the traditional hierarchical structures that remain in some schools. But there is no doubt that to teachers, parents, local authorities, HMIe and others, the Headteacher is very much the leader of the school. Someone has to have final responsibility and that is the Headteacher. I don't feel that schools are a direct reflection of the quality of one person, the Headteacher. I don't believe the charismatic Headteacher model is one that can promote depth, sustainability, nor leadership development and legacy. Where schools are built on such a model, what happens when that Headteacher leaves or moves on?

The Headteacher role is important in all schools. The Headteacher certainly has the power and influence to set the tone for the whole school. They can promote hierarchical structures or they can support more collaborative approaches and agendas. I support the idea that it is teachers who are the main deliverers of the school core business and the role of the Headteacher is to support and encourage teachers as they go about this. We can provide them with the time and space to grow their practice to better support the learners. I believe this is best achieved in a collaborative, open and supportive culture that has teaching and learning at its core. We need to develop shared values and principles that will underpin all our activities. We need to work in partnership with parents and other agencies and develop relationships with these that are also built on openness, collaboration and mutual trust. The Headteacher can facilitate such interactions or stop them dead in the water.

It is true that orchestras can and will go into auto-pilot mode if they feel a lack of confidence in the conductor. But, when you have highly skilled and experienced musicians and an equally skilled and perceptive conductor, then the music and sound they can produce is often greater than the sum of the individual parts of that orchestra. I feel it is the same for schools and Headteachers. Given the right level of expertise and commitment from both teachers and Headteachers, together they can build and achieve something that is deep, innovative, developing and, perhaps most importantly, sustainable. One is dependent on the other. They can achieve only so much working on their own. Their real power lies in their collaboration and mutual appreciation of what each brings to the relationship.

Perhaps the answer to the question posed at the start then is, yes Headteachers are important but equally so are teachers, and those that support them. A school couldn't operate or deliver without teachers, and it possibly could without a Headteacher. But for how long and with what impact? This really is one case where we truly  are 'better together!'

Popular posts from this blog

The Power Within

I sent a tweet the other day which seemed to generate a deal of resonance with some on my PLN. What I said was that meaningful school development can only come from within and cannot be imposed from outside. Now 140 characters on Twitter does have benefits but, as anyone who tweets regularly knows, it also has huge limitations in what you can say. So what I would like to do here is offer some further explanation of what I was trying to convey in my tweet.

For many years well meaning and informed people have increased our understanding and have made constructive suggestions  on how schools can develop and move forward. We also know that there have been lots of other suggestions made by less informed but vocal contributors to this debate! As all in education and schools know, everyone has an opinion or view on what should be going on in our schools. The media loves to feed on all of this and much of it stokes the fires of debate and gives oxygen to some of the wilder suggestions.

As som…

Testing Times for Scotland

'These are not high stakes tests; there will be no 'pass or fail' and no additional workload for children or teachers.' John Swinney 25/11/16 news.gov.scot

I start this look at the introduction of the Scottish National Standardised Assessments (SNSAs) with  statement above from John Swinney, the Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills, made when he announced the contract for our new standardised testing had been awarded to ACER International UK, Ltd. This organisation is a subsidiary of the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), whom have been responsible for the development of the National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) regime of high-stakes testing in the Australian system since 2008. I also believe they were one of a very short list of providers who tendered a bid for this contract.

I was drawn to this statement as I reflected on many of the responses I have received after I put out a request on Twitter …

Play not tests

Last night I attended the launch the 'PlayNotTests' campaign being led by Sue Palmer and the Upstart organisation in Scotland. This campaign is aimed at getting the Scottish government to think again about their decision to introduce standardised testing into Scottish schools, particularly in Primary 1. Upstart is a group whose main aim is the establishment of a play-based 'kindergarten stage' in Scottish schools, and they want to delay children's introduction into the formal education system until they have reached seven years of age. Before that, Upstart and their supporters, of which I am one, believe that young children learn best, and begin to develop the attributes they will need for life and learning, through play based learning, most of which should be located outside of classrooms and school buildings. This is a model that has been successfully developed by a number of Nordic systems, with positive impacts on the well-being as well as the learning of young…