Skip to main content

Not More Sheep!

A few years ago a colleague I was working with first mentioned the term 'professional courage' to me. She was using it to describe actions we sometimes have to take as educational leaders that might not be particularly popular with colleagues, parents, employers or others but which we still should take if we believe them to be the right actions. I really liked the term, and the thinking that lay behind it. Since I first began considering and engaging with the term, I have extended the definition to include difficult conversations that we sometimes have to have and difficult decisions we have to make. Often deciding the route to take in any of these areas does require a degree of 'professional courage' especially when it can bring us into confrontation with others as a result.

If you are a leader, are there times when you have chosen not to take a course of action that you wished because you knew others you work with, or for, would disagree or not support your intended action? Have you sat in meetings where decisions are being made and 'consultations' are taking place, and not voiced honest opinions or disagreements for fear of upsetting those to whom you might be responsible? I think at various times, most of us have, especially when young and new in post. What I have come to believe and have decided as I have matured, both in age and professionally, is that if we truly believe in something we should be prepared to stand up for this, whatever the circumstances.

The starting point for these decisions and actions are your values, and the principles that underpin them. I am sure all of us do the job we love because we want to make a positive difference to the lives through the education of the young people who are in our schools. We will want to do this in a fair and just way, that shows no particular favour to any one group and which is totally non-discriminatory. We will wish to display honesty in all our dealings and display a level of  wisdom and intellectual rigour in our work and interactions. On top of this will be our professional knowledge, understanding and experience that comes with educational leadership, our expertise. Our values and our professional expertise should be the factors that underpin all our actions.

I do wonder if we sometimes let what we desire for our careers get in the way of what we believe to be right for our learners? I have heard from others,and been told myself, on occasions that expressing a certain opinion, or choosing an action, would 'not be good for your career' if it was seen as being opposite to what others were thinking, planning or wishing to happen. I have heard of school leaders, and have experienced myself, being 'warned' or admonished because they have expressed opposition to some planned action in a meeting or conference. What then results is people refusing to openly engage and debate planned changes and actions for fear of the repercussions for them personally and professionally. Such an ethos and culture is damaging to organisations and damaging to the opportunities we have to improve what we are doing.

Equally, school leaders can be guilty of the same practices in their own schools and leadership practices. There are leaders who really believe only they know what is best for their schools. They make the decisions about what will and won't happen, and then expect staff to carry these out. Change does happen in such circumstances, but it tends to be surface level, with no depth, understanding or sustainability to it. Change is slow and fleeting in non-collaborative cultures, and colleagues are de-professionalised. Plus, we lose the opportunity to harness the strength and collaborative power of the team.

 I would argue that professional courage is required at all levels to challenge what needs to be challenged. If we muffle our voice and our opinions because we are afraid of repercussions, what hope do we then have to develop our learners as critical thinkers and vocal responsible citizens? That is not to say we should be reckless, unthinking and belligerent in our responses and our actions. There are ways of expressing opinions without resorting to downright opposition to every new change or initiative proposed. We need to engage in a responsible, informed and professional way, and in that way our views and opinions are more likely to be heard.

Professional courage and responsibility should be part of what it means to be a leader. Never has there been a time of such challenge, but also of such opportunity, in education. We need to engage and ensure our voice is heard. What education needs at such times are more courageous leaders, not more sheep.

Popular posts from this blog

Testing Times for Scotland

'These are not high stakes tests; there will be no 'pass or fail' and no additional workload for children or teachers.' John Swinney 25/11/16

I start this look at the introduction of the Scottish National Standardised Assessments (SNSAs) with  statement above from John Swinney, the Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills, made when he announced the contract for our new standardised testing had been awarded to ACER International UK, Ltd. This organisation is a subsidiary of the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), whom have been responsible for the development of the National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) regime of high-stakes testing in the Australian system since 2008. I also believe they were one of a very short list of providers who tendered a bid for this contract.

I was drawn to this statement as I reflected on many of the responses I have received after I put out a request on Twitter …

Play not tests

Last night I attended the launch the 'PlayNotTests' campaign being led by Sue Palmer and the Upstart organisation in Scotland. This campaign is aimed at getting the Scottish government to think again about their decision to introduce standardised testing into Scottish schools, particularly in Primary 1. Upstart is a group whose main aim is the establishment of a play-based 'kindergarten stage' in Scottish schools, and they want to delay children's introduction into the formal education system until they have reached seven years of age. Before that, Upstart and their supporters, of which I am one, believe that young children learn best, and begin to develop the attributes they will need for life and learning, through play based learning, most of which should be located outside of classrooms and school buildings. This is a model that has been successfully developed by a number of Nordic systems, with positive impacts on the well-being as well as the learning of young…

Some thoughts on Scottish education

This week I was asked if I would go along to speak to labour MSPs and MPs about Scottish education and schools. My brief was to talk about education. its current state, the reality of how the attainment gap can be tackled, how teachers can help government address the challenges of poverty, and how we might start to reinvest in our schools and our teaching staff. The politicians did not want to hear from the 'same people' who always spoke to them, and wanted to hear from someone 'fresh from the chalk-face'. I had forty five minutes, about twenty minutes input from me then a discussion and question and answer session. No pressure there then! Anyway, I gave it my best shot.

I started with a brief introduction to myself and my background, to give them some idea of who this person was, and why they might be able to help them and I tried to cover most of the following in my time slot.

I started with some the positives from our system.

Stuff we should be proud of:
Our learners …