Skip to main content

Professional Learning: A Tale of Two Meetings 2/2

In my last post I was writing about the first meeting of two I took part in last week. The second followed hard on the heels of the first and involved in travelling across Edinburgh by car during the rush hour. I thought this might be easier now that all the tram works were complete and in place. It wasn't!

Anyway, I arrived at my next destination, Easter Road the home of Hibernian football club, for what was billed as 'Education: The value of making mistakes: Helping children and young people develop a growth mindset'. The main speaker was Professor Carol Dweck from Harvard University in  the USA. Carol is famous for her work on, and identification of, 'fixed' and 'growth' mindsets and their respective impacts on learning and development. I have read a couple of her books and have seen her before at the Scottish Learning Festival and through various YouTube clips. I am a fan, so when I heard she was back in Scotland, at the invite of the Winning Scotland Foundation, and that she would be speaking when I was already in Edinburgh it became a no-brainer that I should go and listen to her.

Her presentation started with a quote from Benjamin Barber which she said she likes to start with as she likes that he 'divides the world into learners and non-learners.' She felt this was particularly apt given the nature of her research findings and her life's work on mindsets. Whilst she was in Scotland she was going to be speaking to various audiences and the one I was part of consisted of representatives from schools and local authorities from across Southern Scotland and the central belt. We mainly seemed to be teachers, school leaders, community educators, educational psychologists, quality improvement officers and managers from various local authorities. We were very much an educational audience.

Professor Dweck began to recount her research and her findings from her investigations with learners of all ages and explained how this led to her identification of 'fixed' and 'growth' mindsets, and how these impacted on learning. I started to experience deja-vue. If you have ever been to see her speak, or you have read any of her books you would have perhaps felt the same. Her presentation was almost identical to those I had experienced before. I was disappointed. I was hoping for some new insights from Professor Dweck, new evidence and nuances, new anecdotes and examples. There were none. I felt like someone who had gone to see a comedian I had seen on TV and was then left disappointed as they repeated their whole routine that got me to go and see them live.

Is this fair? There were well over a hundred people in the room and I would say all of them knew exactly who Carol Dweck was and were aware of her work. Did they learn anything new? Certainly there were lots of people making copious notes and the whole event was being filmed and put on Glow, the Scottish Educational web platform. My own thoughts were that if you had not seen her before, what she was saying would certainly be thought provoking and perhaps challenging. But I am sure there were many in the room like myself who left feeling disappointed by the experience. Would I go and see her again, probably not, unless it was on the back of a new piece of research or book with new insights. I still remain a fan however, and we have used her work in all our local schools as we seek to promote the value of effort and resilience in all our learners. I certainly applaud Winning Scotland for extending the invite to Professor Dweck and only they, and time, can be the judge of the cost effectiveness of her visit. The true value will be measured in the impact for all learners and the sportspeople over time, so the jury is out.

Which brings me to my thoughts on the value of one off events for professional development such as this one. Is there a value in them and is their impact sustainable? These to me are two key questions we need to ask. I certainly believe that we need to expose our teachers and leaders to the very best world class thinkers and leaders in education. We cannot remain insular and parochial in our approach to education and learning. We learn from others, as they in turn can learn from us. I have always argued that teachers and school leaders need to engage with research in order to develop their own thinking and practice, in order to improve what we do for all our learners. We should not be passive recipients of new knowledge and research but rather critical thinkers and examiners, so that we understand what is real and what might be snake oil. One off events will only have impact if they generate new thinking, and new practice that is sustainable. On their own they can't achieve this but they can act as a stimulus for the development of a new pathway on our continuous journey of development. If they fit in and support a pathway already being travelled so much the better. They are at their worst when they are just seen as a smorgasbord of activities that lead some into a continuous programme of change that has no depth, no sustainability and is backed by no vision.

One-off events and speakers do have a place in professional development when they are well thought out and stimulate thinking. Far better is a continuous journey of development, based on sound values, a vision and a determination to make a difference for our learners.

'Mindset-The New Psychology of Success'
'Self-Theories:Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development'
'Mindset: How You Can Fulfil You Potential'
All by Carol Dweck







Popular posts from this blog

Some thoughts on Scottish education

This week I was asked if I would go along to speak to labour MSPs and MPs about Scottish education and schools. My brief was to talk about education. its current state, the reality of how the attainment gap can be tackled, how teachers can help government address the challenges of poverty, and how we might start to reinvest in our schools and our teaching staff. The politicians did not want to hear from the 'same people' who always spoke to them, and wanted to hear from someone 'fresh from the chalk-face'. I had forty five minutes, about twenty minutes input from me then a discussion and question and answer session. No pressure there then! Anyway, I gave it my best shot.

I started with a brief introduction to myself and my background, to give them some idea of who this person was, and why they might be able to help them and I tried to cover most of the following in my time slot.

I started with some the positives from our system.

Stuff we should be proud of:
Our learners …

Structure and systems versuses learning, teaching and leadership

A couple of days ago Education Scotland announced that they planned to make changes to how they carried out school inspections as, 'the first step in a radical new way Education Scotland will work to support and drive improvement in schools.' This new 'radical' approach was to carry out more inspections, coupled with employment of new HMIEs and 'associate assessors' so that they could raise the number of inspections from the 180 expected to be undertaken this year, to a target figure of 250 for the following year. Amongst their stated aims was a desire to engage with every school in Scotland each year in order to support schools, teachers and school leaders and to drive forward improvement. They will also seek to include the 'younger voice' in inspections and include more use of learners in the inspection process, aiming to produce a How Good Is Our School (HGIOS) for young people to help them become engaged. (give me strength!) In addition, they will b…

A PISA My Mind

When John Swinney stood up in the Scottish parliament this week and described the performance of Scottish Education as making for 'uncomfortable reading' and that 'radical reform' was needed, he no doubt did this in the belief he was speaking from an informed position. He went on to pledge to bring 'an unwavering focus on improvement' and promised to carry out further reforms 'no matter how controversial.' His message was loud and clear, our performance is not good enough and he was going to change this. I wonder if he ever thought about the impact of his very public pronouncements had on teachers and school leaders as they were heading into their schools the next day? I suspect not.

So, what 'informed' Mr Swinney's assessment of the Scottish education system? Was it from the hundreds of visits he had made to Scottish schools since his appointment in May of this year? Was it from the conversations he had with thousands of pupils, teachers an…