Skip to main content

So you want to enquire into your practice?

So,you want to enquire into your practice? What are the  possible benefits and what are the possible issues you need to consider? The following is based on you understanding practitioner enquiry, and what it entails, thoroughly and you have apply these properly. The schools I lead are into our fifth year of such a process.

Raised attainment and achievement for all learners. I don't know about you, but this is the first requirement I have for all developments.
Deeper understanding of learning for teachers. They better understand learning, their impact on this, and how to deconstruct learning to aid all their learners.
Leads to critically informed teaching. Teachers use data and research to inform their teaching and to critically reflect on their practice.
Teacher confidence improves. As their knowledge and understanding develops, and they better understand how to address gaps in pupil learning, they gain confidence in heir ability to meet the learning needs of all pupils.
Teacher leadership and collaboration are promoted. As confidence and collaboration improves many teachers develop self-agency, the ability to lead others, and to seek such opportunities as part of an ongoing process of development.
Professional dialogue and the learning culture within a school is enhanced. When teachers collaborate to look closely at learning and their practice a culture based on learning is promoted and developed.
The professional identity of teachers changes. Such development promotes transformative learning in individuals and their professional identity changes as new thinking, understanding and practice becomes embedded.

Such an approach is like Pandora's Box. Once you and colleagues go down this route it will be very difficult, if not impossible, to go back to old ways of working. 
It's messy and its complex. This is no linear development and I can guarantee that there will be times when you need to stop, change tack and even go backwards, as you react to how your journey is progressing.
It's challenging. This is no easy option and it will throw up many challenges to your thinking, perceptions and practice. There will be other challenges that are associated with the implementation of such an approach too.
At the outset, a 'critical friend' or support from someone who deeply understands the process is crucial. Leaders and teachers will need support from someone who is experienced and informed.
Such an approach requires an open and supportive culture, based on trust. Teachers need to feel safe and supported, in order to make mistakes and be innovative.
Senior management, including headteachers, need to support and be involved in the process. Only by being fully engaged in the development of such approaches can they understand the demands, and be able to support teachers.
Schools need good processes of self-evaluation so they know where they are starting from. You need to start from where you really are, not where you think you are.
One size does not fit all. Context is crucial and the process needs adjusting to the context of each school.
Care needs to be paid to the pace of change. Too fast and you leave people behind, often slowing down is the best option to give everyone the time to assimilate and embed change into their practice.

This has been a quick post on the benefits and warnings regarding the adoption of practitioner enquiry, by individuals and schools. If you are interested, and I think you should be, go to the GTCS website for more information on this, or you could just keep doing what you have always done for professional development.

Popular posts from this blog

The Power Within

I sent a tweet the other day which seemed to generate a deal of resonance with some on my PLN. What I said was that meaningful school development can only come from within and cannot be imposed from outside. Now 140 characters on Twitter does have benefits but, as anyone who tweets regularly knows, it also has huge limitations in what you can say. So what I would like to do here is offer some further explanation of what I was trying to convey in my tweet.

For many years well meaning and informed people have increased our understanding and have made constructive suggestions  on how schools can develop and move forward. We also know that there have been lots of other suggestions made by less informed but vocal contributors to this debate! As all in education and schools know, everyone has an opinion or view on what should be going on in our schools. The media loves to feed on all of this and much of it stokes the fires of debate and gives oxygen to some of the wilder suggestions.

As som…

Testing Times for Scotland

'These are not high stakes tests; there will be no 'pass or fail' and no additional workload for children or teachers.' John Swinney 25/11/16

I start this look at the introduction of the Scottish National Standardised Assessments (SNSAs) with  statement above from John Swinney, the Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills, made when he announced the contract for our new standardised testing had been awarded to ACER International UK, Ltd. This organisation is a subsidiary of the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), whom have been responsible for the development of the National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) regime of high-stakes testing in the Australian system since 2008. I also believe they were one of a very short list of providers who tendered a bid for this contract.

I was drawn to this statement as I reflected on many of the responses I have received after I put out a request on Twitter …

Play not tests

Last night I attended the launch the 'PlayNotTests' campaign being led by Sue Palmer and the Upstart organisation in Scotland. This campaign is aimed at getting the Scottish government to think again about their decision to introduce standardised testing into Scottish schools, particularly in Primary 1. Upstart is a group whose main aim is the establishment of a play-based 'kindergarten stage' in Scottish schools, and they want to delay children's introduction into the formal education system until they have reached seven years of age. Before that, Upstart and their supporters, of which I am one, believe that young children learn best, and begin to develop the attributes they will need for life and learning, through play based learning, most of which should be located outside of classrooms and school buildings. This is a model that has been successfully developed by a number of Nordic systems, with positive impacts on the well-being as well as the learning of young…