Skip to main content

Da Da Da Data

I was thinking about an old Police song today, as I considered the current massive focus on data and its use in education. The Police song is actually called 'De Do Do Do, De Da Da Da' and you can watch them perform it here. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7v2GDbEmjGE 

Interesting that it has 'do' before 'da', which reflects how I feel about data and how we use it. We need to do something, carry out actions, in order to generate data, not start with the data and shape our actions to improve it. Data is important to schools and their leaders and we gather a whole suite of holistic data about how schools and teachers are doing, and on our impact for learners. Teachers do exactly the same, day in and day out, as they seek to understand where their learners are in their learning, and the impact they as teachers are having on that learning.

If you were to see some of the press releases and statements that have accompanied the introduction of the new National Improvement Framework (NIF) http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2016/01/8314 in Scotland, you could be forgiven for thinking that schools, headteachers and teachers in Scotland have been failing to recognise how data can help and support them, and have been failing to capture any such data about how their learners are progressing in their learning. In my experience this is very far from the truth. Schools in Scotland are awash with data. The trouble is a lot of this is complex and quite sophisticated and is not in a simplified form of percentages, percentiles, levels or letters that everyone can see and understand, especially it seems our politicians. They are looking for a simplified piece of data that they can use to identify year on year improvements being made by the system and by our learners, and perhaps how effective they are in holding schools to account and driving forward improvements. We're it just that easy folks!

As part of the process and procedures to help provide us with the data that 'will enable us to close the equity gap and raise attainment,' as the NIF states, is the reintroduction of standardised testing for primary and early secondary pupils. Andy Hargreaves, who helped write and inform the OECD report on the Scottish Education system published in December 2015, said only last week 'the data can't tell you what to do.' He, and the report which interestingly was commissioned by the Scottish Government after they had produced the draft NIF, recognises the importance of data in improving our schools, but he is pointing out that, useful though data is, what it doesn't do is tell teachers and schools what actions they need to take to address the issues that the data might reveal. To do that, in my opinion, we need to focus on three main areas. We need to embrace career-long professional learning, improve leadership and really focus on, and resource, early intervention strategies. After all, recent research by Edward Sosu and Sue Ellis for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/education-attainment-scotland-full.pdf ) and others has  shown that there is already a substantial gap in language and problem solving skills in learners from the most disadvantaged households and the most advantaged before they enter the education system.

So, it is action that is important, not just data. The data can and should inform the actions we need to take, as long as it is the right data and we remember to engage critically with it. So it is what we 'do' with data that is important, and which can lead to improvements for our learners, as long as that data is showing what it purports to show. The Education Minister and First Minister in Scotland have been at pains to point out that it will be 'teachers professional judgement' that will be at the heart of the evidence they will collect about learners progress in the Scottish system. I hope that this is so, and that this 'professional judgement' is informed by a suite holistic data gathering, which will include standardised testing, as it does now. What my fear is, and there are signs of this happening already, that everyone's attention narrows down to the standardised test results and this will quickly be the way that we decide on which are good schools and good teachers, and which aren't. Standardised testing was never created for that purpose and to use them in such a narrow 'cause and effect' way fails to understand what they can, and what they can't, do. Should this happen, we will move to a 'data driven' system and all the pitfalls associated, such as 'teaching to the test', 'high-stakes', 'high accountability' and a focus on 'performability' and 'compliance'. This would be a disaster for schools, the system and learners. Performance measured in such a narrow way might look to improve year on year, but gaps will widen and nothing will have really changed for our learners. All that will have happened is that everyone has got better at 'playing the game.' 

The NIF sets high ideals for Scottish education that no-one could really argue with. The jury remains out on whether it can support us to achieve those ideals, or whether it will be consigned to the history books of educational development as another example of the failure of 'more of the same' approaches to produce different results.

'Insanity lies in continuing to do the same things and expecting different results.' as someone once said.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Power Within

I sent a tweet the other day which seemed to generate a deal of resonance with some on my PLN. What I said was that meaningful school development can only come from within and cannot be imposed from outside. Now 140 characters on Twitter does have benefits but, as anyone who tweets regularly knows, it also has huge limitations in what you can say. So what I would like to do here is offer some further explanation of what I was trying to convey in my tweet.

For many years well meaning and informed people have increased our understanding and have made constructive suggestions  on how schools can develop and move forward. We also know that there have been lots of other suggestions made by less informed but vocal contributors to this debate! As all in education and schools know, everyone has an opinion or view on what should be going on in our schools. The media loves to feed on all of this and much of it stokes the fires of debate and gives oxygen to some of the wilder suggestions.

As som…

Why we might need more tortoises and fewer hares in education

We have heard Aesop's fable of 'The Tortoise and the Hare.' In this tale with a message, a tortoise challenges an arrogant hare to a race. The hare quickly leaves the tortoise behind. Being so confident,  he decides to have a sleep midway through the race. When the hare wakes, he finds the tortoise, who has kept slowly moving forward, has arrived before him, and has won. A common interpretation of the message of this fable is 'slow and steady wins the race.'

Thinking of schools and education, I believe we celebrate hares too much, and tortoises not enough. School systems are full of people racing to do lots of things, as quickly as possible. Education is not a race. Education is a relentless process of personal enlightenment, growth and development. There is no end point. In that case, it is through adopting the dispositions and characteristics of the tortoise in Aesop's fable that we are most likely to keep making strong, steady progress. Such a relentless ap…

Improving versus proving

During the first two months of 2019 I have been able to attend a number of professional learning events across Scotland. What has been impressive about these events is, not only the breadth and range of development activity taking place across the system, but also the commitment, professionalism and determination of people to getting better at what they do.

What such events also provide, is the opportunity to develop my own thinking and understanding, through listening to the experiences of others and engage in a dialogue around the issues, experiences and insights of different participants. I believe that professional learning with the greatest impacts, should produce changes in facilitators and leaders, not just the participants.

This week I was facilitating a session on parental engagement, on behalf of Connect the parent/teacher organisation in Scotland. This session was with school leaders, and others who had responsibility for this particular area of school development. What I …