Skip to main content

What to do when the school improvement plan goes wrong

The easy answer to the title of this post is 'to accept and embrace it!' Mind you I might have not chosen the most accurate of titles, because I have been writing school improvement plans for some sixteen years now and I have yet to produce one that went according to the said plan. Perhaps a more interesting title would be 'what to do when school improvement plans work' but, as I have little experience of this I might struggle to write that much that you might find helpful, or realistic.

School improvement plans can go awry for lots of reasons. Some of these are entirely our own fault, and some are the result of pesky circumstances. Sometimes you can put so much into a plan, even the most productive and focused of organisations anywhere would struggle to achieve its lofty aims. I have been there. Some of my early improvements plans had so many actions they could have been written by a choreographer for Village People! There were a variety of elaborate actions detailed but with little thought given to how deliverable they were by a small staff of very busy teachers, who were trying to deliver each day for all their learners. Some of my early improvement plans were almost of book length and couldn't have been much of a read as we never seemed to finish one. 

Moving on to my plan from last session. This was radically different to my first efforts, in that it was only a few pages long and had three main actions. I am now working across two schools, instead of one,  and with many more staff to help share the development workload. A doddle, you would think. But no, again circumstances conspired to prevent us from completing yet another plan. Staffing was a major issue last session. We had staff leave on secondments, two pregnancies, some long term illness and a succession of replacement teachers to cover some of our classes. Included in these were my DHT and myself having to teach classes at times when we found finding supply teachers rarer that vets who specialise in dental work for hens. Add to this was the fact that we had to host another school, it's pupils, staff and parents for over one term, and the further disruption ensued. Both factors had big impacts on the delivery of our development plan and prevented us from completing all we wanted.

This current session we have two main targets. We have a settled staff again and I am filled with high hopes that this could be the year. Already, four weeks in, we have made significant advances in both key areas. I have been able to release staff, because I planned to, so that they can collaborate to deliver improvements for all our learners. We have had a number of productive collegiate development sessions after school and I look forward optimistically to our next In-Service days in November. But who knows what lies ahead that may derail us from our metaphorical developmental train journey? The only certainty in school development is the uncertainty. 

I still maintain that such plans are a vital to school development. Plans help us to develop and move forward from where we are to where we would like to be. Without a plan how do we know what we should do and whether we have done it? A plan allows us to reflect on what we have achieved, as well as consider what we have not, and why. One plan is the starting point for another. We really do need to accept and embrace the fact that we might not achieve all we set out in our plan. Don't beat yourself up about the things you don't achieve, but celebrate all those you do. Plans are just that. Like Balderick in 'Blackadder' make sure everyone knows you have one, cunning or not, and what their part in it is. They are not set in stone, they need flexibility and realism built into them. Like all school development, the plan is part of a relentless process and they have to reflect the complexity of the challenges we face, many of which are unpredictable but can still be expected.

So to answer my own challenge in the title, accept it, it's going to happen. It's not a bad thing and it doesn't make you a bad person or a bad leader, or your plan a bad plan. Remember, shift happens!

Popular posts from this blog

The Power Within

I sent a tweet the other day which seemed to generate a deal of resonance with some on my PLN. What I said was that meaningful school development can only come from within and cannot be imposed from outside. Now 140 characters on Twitter does have benefits but, as anyone who tweets regularly knows, it also has huge limitations in what you can say. So what I would like to do here is offer some further explanation of what I was trying to convey in my tweet.

For many years well meaning and informed people have increased our understanding and have made constructive suggestions  on how schools can develop and move forward. We also know that there have been lots of other suggestions made by less informed but vocal contributors to this debate! As all in education and schools know, everyone has an opinion or view on what should be going on in our schools. The media loves to feed on all of this and much of it stokes the fires of debate and gives oxygen to some of the wilder suggestions.

As som…

Testing Times for Scotland

'These are not high stakes tests; there will be no 'pass or fail' and no additional workload for children or teachers.' John Swinney 25/11/16

I start this look at the introduction of the Scottish National Standardised Assessments (SNSAs) with  statement above from John Swinney, the Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills, made when he announced the contract for our new standardised testing had been awarded to ACER International UK, Ltd. This organisation is a subsidiary of the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), whom have been responsible for the development of the National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) regime of high-stakes testing in the Australian system since 2008. I also believe they were one of a very short list of providers who tendered a bid for this contract.

I was drawn to this statement as I reflected on many of the responses I have received after I put out a request on Twitter …

Play not tests

Last night I attended the launch the 'PlayNotTests' campaign being led by Sue Palmer and the Upstart organisation in Scotland. This campaign is aimed at getting the Scottish government to think again about their decision to introduce standardised testing into Scottish schools, particularly in Primary 1. Upstart is a group whose main aim is the establishment of a play-based 'kindergarten stage' in Scottish schools, and they want to delay children's introduction into the formal education system until they have reached seven years of age. Before that, Upstart and their supporters, of which I am one, believe that young children learn best, and begin to develop the attributes they will need for life and learning, through play based learning, most of which should be located outside of classrooms and school buildings. This is a model that has been successfully developed by a number of Nordic systems, with positive impacts on the well-being as well as the learning of young…