Skip to main content

I Don't Encourage Innovation!

Yes folks, I really don't encourage innovation in the schools I lead. I expect it!

Amongst the characteristics I expect to see in all staff, teachers and support workers, is a constant curiosity that is enshrined in the question, "what if?" I want staff to ask this of themselves and their work constantly. I want them to ask it of each other and importantly of me. I want staff who are reflective and professionally curious. If I wanted sheep, I would be a farmer!

I expect staff to be constantly engaged in an examination of what goes on in classrooms and around school, and thinking about, and identifying, how we might do things differently, and better. That is not to say that everything is in a constant state of flux, or that we promote change for change sake, because that is not what we do. Therein lies madness and is the surest way to destroy practice and morale in staff. Innovation and change should be not based on whims, they have to be based on sound research and practice, but they are expected. We expect the same from our pupils and this makes it even more important that staff model such behaviours themselves.

I don't want staff who are afraid to take risks or ask hard questions. I don't want staff who are always in their comfort zones and don't want to push and change the status quo. I want them to learn from their own experiences, from those of their colleagues and from the wider professional education body.  I want them to develop as people and as professional practitioners. I want them to read and I want them to think! If one of them is the same in their practice and their understanding as they were five years ago, they have wasted five years and I have let them down.

Such an approach can be challenging for all staff, for senior management and for headteachers. Therefore time needs to be taken to build a school culture and ethos that promotes such behaviours and expectations. Staff will not take risks if they do not trust their Headteacher and senior managers. Why would they take risks if they feel errors or mistakes would be frowned upon and used to judge them negatively? Why would they take risks if they felt they were on their own and unsupported? They just wouldn't. No-one would put their heads above the parapet to ask questions and truly innovate. But if we are being honest, hasn't this part of the culture in schools, and around education for many years. I don't  blame schools and headteachers for this because I think this is a direct result of the play-safe approach engendered by how schools have been judged and reported on for many years. The traditional hierarchical approaches to organisation within schools has also had a negative impact. Ideally this too needs to change to really support innovation. I live in hope and there are signs of movement in some of these areas.

I admit some might think I ask a lot of staff in my schools, but my experience is that all staff will respond positively if given the right conditions, encouragement trust and support. They know that I ask nothing of them that I do not ask of myself. All this keeps me on my toes and means that I work in schools that buzz with excitement and purpose, and which have high expectations of all.

So, don't encourage innovation, demand it! You owe it to your schools and all your learners.



Popular posts from this blog

Testing Times for Scotland

'These are not high stakes tests; there will be no 'pass or fail' and no additional workload for children or teachers.' John Swinney 25/11/16 news.gov.scot

I start this look at the introduction of the Scottish National Standardised Assessments (SNSAs) with  statement above from John Swinney, the Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills, made when he announced the contract for our new standardised testing had been awarded to ACER International UK, Ltd. This organisation is a subsidiary of the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), whom have been responsible for the development of the National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) regime of high-stakes testing in the Australian system since 2008. I also believe they were one of a very short list of providers who tendered a bid for this contract.

I was drawn to this statement as I reflected on many of the responses I have received after I put out a request on Twitter …

Play not tests

Last night I attended the launch the 'PlayNotTests' campaign being led by Sue Palmer and the Upstart organisation in Scotland. This campaign is aimed at getting the Scottish government to think again about their decision to introduce standardised testing into Scottish schools, particularly in Primary 1. Upstart is a group whose main aim is the establishment of a play-based 'kindergarten stage' in Scottish schools, and they want to delay children's introduction into the formal education system until they have reached seven years of age. Before that, Upstart and their supporters, of which I am one, believe that young children learn best, and begin to develop the attributes they will need for life and learning, through play based learning, most of which should be located outside of classrooms and school buildings. This is a model that has been successfully developed by a number of Nordic systems, with positive impacts on the well-being as well as the learning of young…

Some thoughts on Scottish education

This week I was asked if I would go along to speak to labour MSPs and MPs about Scottish education and schools. My brief was to talk about education. its current state, the reality of how the attainment gap can be tackled, how teachers can help government address the challenges of poverty, and how we might start to reinvest in our schools and our teaching staff. The politicians did not want to hear from the 'same people' who always spoke to them, and wanted to hear from someone 'fresh from the chalk-face'. I had forty five minutes, about twenty minutes input from me then a discussion and question and answer session. No pressure there then! Anyway, I gave it my best shot.

I started with a brief introduction to myself and my background, to give them some idea of who this person was, and why they might be able to help them and I tried to cover most of the following in my time slot.

I started with some the positives from our system.

Stuff we should be proud of:
Our learners …