Skip to main content

We Are Not Alone!

For the last there and a half years the schools I manage have been working very closely with colleagues from Edinburgh University. In that time we have developed a relationship built on mutual respect that has, I believe, produced benefits for both organisations. We in school have had access to a level of professional expertise, knowledge and experience that has enabled us to update and improve our understanding and our practice, to the benefit of all our pupils. The university has had the opportunity to work closely with committed staff, trial new approaches to teacher development, understand and witness the complexity faced by schools and teachers in managing curriculum reform and development and help them in understanding how they may build sustainable partnerships with schools and local authorities.

So if this is seen by both schools and university as a 'win-win' situation why are such partnerships and joint working not more common? There has been for many years an atmosphere of mistrust between schools and universities. Schools have often seen universities as cut off and remote from the real, day to day work of education. How often have NQTs been told by schools that "all that academic stuff might be alright in university, but now you will find out what teaching is really about," or something similar? For how many years have staff in universities looked down on on a lot of what goes on in schools, and dismissed developments that seem to have little evidence, thinking or rationale behind their adoption? There is a hierarchy in education and schools should know their place in that, seemed a common view in higher education. Both these levels of mistrust kept on feeding each other!

However, we now seem to be moving on in our thinking and identifying how both sectors can, and should, support each other. In Scotland Graham Donaldson's report 'Teaching Scotland's Future' identified the necessity for higher education establishments, who are providing initial teacher education programmes, and local authorities and schools to work closely together. This is seen as vital not only to help train the next generation of teacher, but also to help the rest of the profession attain career-long professional development as articulated by the GTCS and their new professional standards for teachers in Scotland. The Donaldson report has been adopted in its entirety by the Scottish Government and so, when combined with the new GTCS standards, we have a climate and support to build bridges and establish new relationships, for the benefit of all.

If the experience my schools have had over the last few years is replicated by other partnerships, Scottish educationation and schools are going to be the winners. I know similar partnership and closer working practices are being developed in other areas and with other universities. My recommendation to Headteachers and schools is to look for and embrace these relationships. You will have the opportunity to deepen your own understanding, and that of your colleagues, by engaging with latest thinking and research around teaching and learning. You will be contributing to meaningful research around these same areas, and you and staff will be given high level support in managing change and school development. If you and the university keep things real you will support and help each other and, in the process, help the staff and the pupils in your schools reach improved levels of attainment and achievement.

You are only alone in school development if you choose to be. The choice is yours!

Popular posts from this blog

Some thoughts on Scottish education

This week I was asked if I would go along to speak to labour MSPs and MPs about Scottish education and schools. My brief was to talk about education. its current state, the reality of how the attainment gap can be tackled, how teachers can help government address the challenges of poverty, and how we might start to reinvest in our schools and our teaching staff. The politicians did not want to hear from the 'same people' who always spoke to them, and wanted to hear from someone 'fresh from the chalk-face'. I had forty five minutes, about twenty minutes input from me then a discussion and question and answer session. No pressure there then! Anyway, I gave it my best shot.

I started with a brief introduction to myself and my background, to give them some idea of who this person was, and why they might be able to help them and I tried to cover most of the following in my time slot.

I started with some the positives from our system.

Stuff we should be proud of:
Our learners …

Structure and systems versuses learning, teaching and leadership

A couple of days ago Education Scotland announced that they planned to make changes to how they carried out school inspections as, 'the first step in a radical new way Education Scotland will work to support and drive improvement in schools.' This new 'radical' approach was to carry out more inspections, coupled with employment of new HMIEs and 'associate assessors' so that they could raise the number of inspections from the 180 expected to be undertaken this year, to a target figure of 250 for the following year. Amongst their stated aims was a desire to engage with every school in Scotland each year in order to support schools, teachers and school leaders and to drive forward improvement. They will also seek to include the 'younger voice' in inspections and include more use of learners in the inspection process, aiming to produce a How Good Is Our School (HGIOS) for young people to help them become engaged. (give me strength!) In addition, they will b…

A PISA My Mind

When John Swinney stood up in the Scottish parliament this week and described the performance of Scottish Education as making for 'uncomfortable reading' and that 'radical reform' was needed, he no doubt did this in the belief he was speaking from an informed position. He went on to pledge to bring 'an unwavering focus on improvement' and promised to carry out further reforms 'no matter how controversial.' His message was loud and clear, our performance is not good enough and he was going to change this. I wonder if he ever thought about the impact of his very public pronouncements had on teachers and school leaders as they were heading into their schools the next day? I suspect not.

So, what 'informed' Mr Swinney's assessment of the Scottish education system? Was it from the hundreds of visits he had made to Scottish schools since his appointment in May of this year? Was it from the conversations he had with thousands of pupils, teachers an…