Skip to main content

We Are Not Alone!

For the last there and a half years the schools I manage have been working very closely with colleagues from Edinburgh University. In that time we have developed a relationship built on mutual respect that has, I believe, produced benefits for both organisations. We in school have had access to a level of professional expertise, knowledge and experience that has enabled us to update and improve our understanding and our practice, to the benefit of all our pupils. The university has had the opportunity to work closely with committed staff, trial new approaches to teacher development, understand and witness the complexity faced by schools and teachers in managing curriculum reform and development and help them in understanding how they may build sustainable partnerships with schools and local authorities.

So if this is seen by both schools and university as a 'win-win' situation why are such partnerships and joint working not more common? There has been for many years an atmosphere of mistrust between schools and universities. Schools have often seen universities as cut off and remote from the real, day to day work of education. How often have NQTs been told by schools that "all that academic stuff might be alright in university, but now you will find out what teaching is really about," or something similar? For how many years have staff in universities looked down on on a lot of what goes on in schools, and dismissed developments that seem to have little evidence, thinking or rationale behind their adoption? There is a hierarchy in education and schools should know their place in that, seemed a common view in higher education. Both these levels of mistrust kept on feeding each other!

However, we now seem to be moving on in our thinking and identifying how both sectors can, and should, support each other. In Scotland Graham Donaldson's report 'Teaching Scotland's Future' identified the necessity for higher education establishments, who are providing initial teacher education programmes, and local authorities and schools to work closely together. This is seen as vital not only to help train the next generation of teacher, but also to help the rest of the profession attain career-long professional development as articulated by the GTCS and their new professional standards for teachers in Scotland. The Donaldson report has been adopted in its entirety by the Scottish Government and so, when combined with the new GTCS standards, we have a climate and support to build bridges and establish new relationships, for the benefit of all.

If the experience my schools have had over the last few years is replicated by other partnerships, Scottish educationation and schools are going to be the winners. I know similar partnership and closer working practices are being developed in other areas and with other universities. My recommendation to Headteachers and schools is to look for and embrace these relationships. You will have the opportunity to deepen your own understanding, and that of your colleagues, by engaging with latest thinking and research around teaching and learning. You will be contributing to meaningful research around these same areas, and you and staff will be given high level support in managing change and school development. If you and the university keep things real you will support and help each other and, in the process, help the staff and the pupils in your schools reach improved levels of attainment and achievement.

You are only alone in school development if you choose to be. The choice is yours!

Popular posts from this blog

Testing Times for Scotland

'These are not high stakes tests; there will be no 'pass or fail' and no additional workload for children or teachers.' John Swinney 25/11/16 news.gov.scot

I start this look at the introduction of the Scottish National Standardised Assessments (SNSAs) with  statement above from John Swinney, the Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills, made when he announced the contract for our new standardised testing had been awarded to ACER International UK, Ltd. This organisation is a subsidiary of the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), whom have been responsible for the development of the National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) regime of high-stakes testing in the Australian system since 2008. I also believe they were one of a very short list of providers who tendered a bid for this contract.

I was drawn to this statement as I reflected on many of the responses I have received after I put out a request on Twitter …

Play not tests

Last night I attended the launch the 'PlayNotTests' campaign being led by Sue Palmer and the Upstart organisation in Scotland. This campaign is aimed at getting the Scottish government to think again about their decision to introduce standardised testing into Scottish schools, particularly in Primary 1. Upstart is a group whose main aim is the establishment of a play-based 'kindergarten stage' in Scottish schools, and they want to delay children's introduction into the formal education system until they have reached seven years of age. Before that, Upstart and their supporters, of which I am one, believe that young children learn best, and begin to develop the attributes they will need for life and learning, through play based learning, most of which should be located outside of classrooms and school buildings. This is a model that has been successfully developed by a number of Nordic systems, with positive impacts on the well-being as well as the learning of young…

Some thoughts on Scottish education

This week I was asked if I would go along to speak to labour MSPs and MPs about Scottish education and schools. My brief was to talk about education. its current state, the reality of how the attainment gap can be tackled, how teachers can help government address the challenges of poverty, and how we might start to reinvest in our schools and our teaching staff. The politicians did not want to hear from the 'same people' who always spoke to them, and wanted to hear from someone 'fresh from the chalk-face'. I had forty five minutes, about twenty minutes input from me then a discussion and question and answer session. No pressure there then! Anyway, I gave it my best shot.

I started with a brief introduction to myself and my background, to give them some idea of who this person was, and why they might be able to help them and I tried to cover most of the following in my time slot.

I started with some the positives from our system.

Stuff we should be proud of:
Our learners …